Wednesday, March 25, 2009

There is nothing better than jiaozi

My trip to San Diego included a lesson on how to fill, wrap and boil the delicious and culinarily intimidating pouches that are Chinese dumplings. Actually, it was my first time eating these outside of a Chinese restaurant, and both the making and the eating were extremely enjoyable.

The chosen variety was filled with pork and cabbage.

I took copious notes on the process, but I'm guessing that my first solo attempt will be quite humbling.

Though my Nikon is probably now being enjoyed by a lucky craigslist bargain-hunter, my phone did a semi-acceptable job of capturing some of the action.

Roll, chop, roll, chop, flatten, rotate, flatten, rotate.


Fill, pinch, boil, cool, boil, cool, boil, cool.


In addition to dumplings, San Diego had a lot to offer. Notably, at Balboa park, one of the tastiest ice cream bars I've ever had.



Sunday, March 15, 2009

Ineffective PSAs all over my commute

I don't know whether I'm naturally very aware of advertisements, or if Mad Men has made me that way. This one in particular seems to be everywhere, particularly at bus stops, and it really shouldn't be.

In case it's too blurry to read, the three lines are:


started going for short walks during lunch hour
stops ordering take-out and starts cooking healthy meals
just bought bikini that challenges some obscenity laws
Yikes. There are plenty of good points here about why this ad is completely mislead and offensive.

Obviously there are a lot of problems with the campaign in general, but I find--particularly when forced to stand next to this poster for any length of time--the word-choice extremely frustrating. The grammar is completely non-parallel and tense inconsistent. So who's responsible for placing this ineffective, offensive, and poorly constructed thing into my line of vision on a near-daily basis?
The Ad Council last year, in partnership with the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, launched a public service campaign that urges Americans to take small steps to lose pounds and inches. On the screen you see step 19 of a 120 small steps, all of which can be found on-line at www.smallstep.gov. The pro-bono work is by McCann New York and includes humorous ads showing the positive results that taking enough small steps might produce. (link)
Thank you DHHS for the wasted tax dollars and McCann for the shoddy copy and offensive/ineffective message.

Sunday, March 8, 2009

Goodbye to liberal arts?

There have been a few reports recently, like this one in the New York Times, warning about the increasing share of family income required to put a student through college.
Last year, the net cost at a four-year public university amounted to 28 percent of the median family income, while a four-year private university cost 76 percent of the median family income.
That's scary. But besides increasing numbers of families unable to pay for higher education (or going into more debt to do so), I wonder whether we will see another short to medium-term recessionary effect on education--a shift in choice of studies, particularly at the undergraduate level.

When I was beginning college in 2003, the economy was pretty significantly different. It wasn't great (unemployment 6%, compared with today's 8%), but we hadn't just been hit with a financial crisis, and we weren't in a deep recession. I remember many conversations about the all-important choice of major, most of which revolved around personal interests, professors, university-specific requirements, and of course, careers. At least back in freshmen year, however, the career portion of these conversations was only but a segment, and focused on the breadth of things one could go on to do after getting a degree in chemical engineering, psychology or public policy.

Today, at college campuses across the country, I'd imagine the conversation sounds a bit different. College freshmen--and even high school students--hear the stories from fellow-students approaching graduation and considering the options (work, travel, more school). Included in those are most definitely the subset of horror stories from students who are finding the job outlook shockingly more bleak than they had expected (even after widening their scope to less-relevant or less personally interesting fields). My personal experience tells me that these challenges travel quickly through the grapevine of friends, classes, and parental cautionary tails. Surely college frosh are listening; some of them must be asking themselves how attractive their intended major will really be. It's not a new question by any means, but perhaps the stakes have changed.

My guess is we'll see a trend in education, starting right now, towards departments with direct links to the industries that are still hiring the largest numbers. I'm not sure which majors will see the largest benefit (but I might guess computer science, economics, and biology/biochemistry--though med-school applications are way up too, and therefore even more competitive than usual) but you can bet the liberal arts aren't on the list.

So departments will shrink, funding will be redistributed. But the medium/long-term effect on the workforce? Perhaps less generalists and more unhappy students (compelled to study a field fit for a dreary job market, but not for them). The arts will suffer, that's clear, but I think there's more.

The kids who majored in Italian literature--these are the ones that chose their field because they were intrigued by it, not because it would land them a good salary once they tossed their caps. As a society, I want to believe we get something very important from encouraging those guys to study what they want.

Of course there are interest-motivated students outside of the liberal arts (I'd like to think I was one of them). But in fields with few post-graduation perks, I think you find a lot of very valuable minds, and I don't think I want those minds to be coerced into anything, let alone today's most marketable degree.

Tuesday, March 3, 2009

Wicked lottery

Last weekend I saw Wicked at the Orpheum, which was excellent and very cleverly written and acted. Especially exciting, though, was that we got L&M row orchestra seats (from which most of the stage was quite visible) for $25 as opposed to the typical $99 for weekend performances.

I don't know whether the Orpheum does this same-day lottery drawing (details here) for all of its performances, but it's extremely worthwhile if heading into SF isn't a full-day commitment for you. I went on Saturday which I'm sure is more competitive than the weekday shows, and I'd guess there were 100-120 names in the bucket by the time they began drawing (2 hours before the show). They called about 7 names for connected seats, and another 5 (including us, yay!) for split seats, which turned out to be in front of one another. You're allowed to submit one name per person so our chances were around 20%, though it definitely felt like a bit of a long-shot amidst the crowd.

Needless to say, an excellent deal, and another great perk of living in the city.

Dogs spotted

...and captured with my phone.

Outside cafe Mojo.


Parked on Fulton.


Jewelry shop display on Divisadero.

Monday, March 2, 2009

Grandma's macaroons

I got an excellent lesson in one of my all-time favorite baked goods from Fran's oven: almond macaroons. Here's the recipe we used, originally from Julia Child and adapted by Fran Raboff:
Makes 2 dozen macaroons 2 inches (5cm) in diameter.



Ingredients:
8 ounces almond paste
1 cup (1/4 L) sugar
1/4 cup powdered sugar
1/4 tsp pure almond extract
pinch of salt
1/4 to 3/4 cup egg whites (2 to 4 whites)

Equipment:
Food processor, 2 baking sheets lined with parchment paper or brown paper.

Instructions:
Prepare cookie sheets, but do not grease them or grease the paper. Preheat oven to 325 F, set racks in lower and upper middle levels.

Cut almond paste into 1/2-inch pieces. Put into container of processor and cut up finely by pulsing processor. When almond paste resembles coarse brown sugar, add granulated sugar and process again in spurts. Scrape down sides of container with spatula. Add almond extract, salt, and 1/4 cup egg whites, and process until no lumps of almond paste remain. Mixture should hold onto a spatula. If it's too stiff, add more egg white and process again.

Remove mixture to a bowl and beat well with a wooden spoon. Use pastry bag or drop mixture from a spoon to form 3/4 inch blobs on the paper, spaced 1 1/2 inches apart.

Bake in preheated oven 15-20 minutes, switching sheets on the racks halfway through. Macaroons are done when lightly brown and crusty on top.

When cool, turn parchment paper over and dampen the back until macaroons come off easily.
Then the fun part.
Melt in a saucepan over water at low heat:
1/2 cup semi-sweet chocolate chips
2 tbsp butter
1 tbsp corn syrup
Dip, dip, dip. Thanks Fran!